›› Request for Proposals and Bids
[ Public Notice - (PDF) ]:
NEW** -
Processing and Recycling of Auto, Truck, and Industrial Tires (PDF)
Solicitor (PDF)
Bond Counsel (PDF)
Auditor (PDF)
Insurance Broker of Record (PDF)
Engineer - Special Projects (PDF)
Engineer - Landfill Related (PDF)
Engineer Annual Topographical Survey (PDF)
SALEM COUNTY UTILITIES AUTHORITY
AWARD CRITERIA
1. Proposals will be evaluated by the Salem County Utilities Authority on the basis of the most
advantageous, price and other factors considered. The evaluation will consider:
a. Experience and reputation in the field;
b. Knowledge of the Salem County Utilities Authority and the subject matter to be
addressed under the contract;
c. Availability to accommodate any required meetings of the agency;
d. Office resources, including back-up staff;
e. Cost
f. Other factors if demonstrated to be in the best interest of the Salem County Utilities
Authority.
2. The following criteria, found under the competitive contracting rules at N.J.A.C. 5:34-4.2 may also be of assistance. These criteria are not intended to be limiting or all-inclusive, and they may be adapted or supplemented in order to meet an agency's needs. No criteria should unfairly or illegally discriminate or exclude otherwise capable vendors.
I. Technical criteria:
A. Proposed methodology:
1. Does the vendor's proposal demonstrate a clear understanding of the scope of work
and related objectives?
2. Is the vendor's proposal complete and responsive to the specific RFP requirements?
3. Has the past performance of the vendor's proposed methodology been documented?
4. Does the vendor's proposal use innovative technology and techniques?
5. Are sound environmental practices such as recycling, energy efficiency, and waste
reduction used?
II. Management criteria:
A. Project management:
1. How well does the proposed scheduling timeline meet the agency's needs?
2. Is there a project management plan?
B. History and experience in performing the work:
1. Does the vendor document a record of reliability of timely delivery and on-time and on-
budget implementation?
2. Does the vendor demonstrate a track record of service as
evidenced by on-time, on-budget, and contract compliance performance?
3. Does the vendor document industry or program experience?
4. Does the vendor have a record of moral integrity?
C. Availability of personnel, facilities, equipment and other resources:
1. To what extent does the vendor rely on in-house resources vs. contracted resources?
2. Are the availability of in-house and contract resources documented?
D. Qualification and experience of personnel:
1. Documentation of experience in performing similar work by employees and when
appropriate, sub-contractors?
2. Does the vendor make use of business capabilities or initiatives that involve women, the
disadvantaged, small and/or minority owned business establishments?
3. Does the vendor demonstrate cultural sensitivity in hiring and training staff?
III. Cost criteria:
A. Cost of goods to be provided or services to be performed:
1. Relative cost: How does the cost compare to other similarly scored proposals?
2. Full explanation: Is the price and its component charges, fees, etc., adequately explained or documented?
B. Assurances of performance:
1. If required, are suitable bonds, warranties, or guarantees provided?
2. Does the proposal include quality control and assurance programs?
C. Vendor's financial stability and strength:
1. Does the vendor have sufficient financial resources to meet its obligations?
If you need further assistance or information, please contact us [ info@scua.org ].
To reach us offline, please use the following information:
Salem County Utilities Authority
The 3 R's

The 10 Challenges
RECYCLE TODAY